Address:2137 Danforth Ave., Toronto, ON M4C 1K2 | Phone:(416) 461-6516

Understanding the Materials Used in Crowns and Bridges

When restoring damaged or missing teeth, crowns and bridges play a crucial role in restoring function, structure, and appearance. Whether it’s protecting a weakened tooth or replacing one entirely, the materials used in these restorations can significantly affect their performance, longevity, and aesthetics. At Danforth Dental Solutions in Toronto, ON, patients often want to understand the differences between materials so they can make informed decisions alongside their dentist. This guide explores the primary materials used in dental crowns and bridges—porcelain, ceramics, metals, and hybrid options—and explains how each works within different clinical scenarios.

Porcelain and Ceramic Crowns: Beauty That Mimics Nature

Porcelain and ceramic are popular materials for crowns and bridges due to their lifelike appearance and ability to match natural tooth color. Porcelain, in particular, has excellent translucency, which allows it to closely replicate the way light reflects off enamel. These materials are often chosen for front teeth where aesthetics are paramount, as they can be customized in both color and shape to blend seamlessly with the rest of a patient’s smile.

Ceramics have improved significantly over the years. Modern ceramic materials like lithium disilicate (commonly known by the brand name IPS e.max) offer increased strength without sacrificing visual appeal. These newer ceramics are more fracture-resistant and durable than older forms of porcelain, making them viable for use in molars in select cases. However, because all-ceramic restorations can be more brittle than their metal-based counterparts, their placement is usually limited to areas of the mouth where biting forces are less intense.

While porcelain and ceramics offer superior cosmetic results, they can sometimes cause wear on opposing natural teeth due to their hardness. Additionally, they may not be ideal for patients with heavy grinding or clenching habits unless reinforced with other structural materials.

Metal Crowns and Bridges: Strength Above All

Metal-based crowns and bridges are known for their exceptional durability and strength. These restorations can be made from various metal types, including gold alloys, base metal alloys (like nickel-chromium), and palladium alloys. Gold, in particular, has long been valued in dentistry due to its biocompatibility, resistance to corrosion, and malleability, which allows for a precise fit.

Metal restorations are highly resistant to chipping and cracking, making them an excellent choice for molars and other areas subjected to heavy chewing pressure. Unlike porcelain, metals do not wear down opposing teeth and can last decades with proper care. Another key advantage is the minimal amount of tooth reduction required during the preparation process, as metals are inherently strong even in thin layers.

The main disadvantage of metal crowns is their appearance. Because they are not tooth-colored, they are rarely used on front teeth unless aesthetics are not a concern. Despite this, metal remains a trusted material for patients prioritizing longevity and function over cosmetics.

Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal (PFM): A Blend of Strength and Aesthetics

Porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns and bridges attempt to bridge the gap between the strength of metal and the appearance of porcelain. These restorations feature a metal substructure over which a layer of porcelain is applied to mimic the look of natural teeth. PFMs have been a mainstay in restorative dentistry for decades and are still widely used today.

One of the biggest advantages of PFMs is their versatility. The metal base provides strength and stability, especially for multi-unit bridges that need to span larger gaps. The porcelain overlay adds a cosmetic element, making them suitable for both front and back teeth. However, over time, the porcelain can chip or fracture, especially in patients with bruxism (teeth grinding). There’s also the risk of the underlying metal becoming visible at the gumline if gum recession occurs, leading to aesthetic concerns.

PFMs are a compromise between function and beauty. They remain a cost-effective and time-tested solution, although newer materials like zirconia are becoming more popular due to their similar strength and improved aesthetics.

Zirconia: The Rising Star of Restorative Dentistry

Zirconia is a high-performance ceramic that is rapidly becoming a material of choice for both crowns and bridges. Unlike traditional porcelain, zirconia is made from zirconium dioxide, a material known for its extraordinary strength and fracture resistance. It is also more biocompatible than many metal alloys, making it an excellent option for patients with metal sensitivities.

One of the key advantages of zirconia is that it can be used in both monolithic (solid) and layered forms. Monolithic zirconia crowns are extremely durable and ideal for back teeth, while layered zirconia adds a more natural-looking finish, suitable for anterior restorations. The material’s ability to be milled digitally also ensures a precise fit, which contributes to better long-term performance.

Zirconia restorations are also less abrasive to opposing teeth than traditional ceramics, and they can often be thinner than porcelain without compromising durability. However, while aesthetics have improved in recent years, zirconia may still not achieve the same translucency as high-quality porcelain in some cases, particularly in front teeth where light reflection is critical.

Resin-Based Crowns: A Short-Term Solution

Resin-based crowns are typically used as temporary restorations while a permanent crown or bridge is being fabricated. These materials are made of composite resins, which are less expensive and easier to adjust than other options. Resin crowns are generally not intended for long-term use because they are more prone to wear, staining, and fractures.

In some cases, resin materials may be used for permanent crowns in pediatric dentistry or for patients with specific limitations, such as budgetary concerns. However, their lower durability and aesthetic value make them less ideal for long-term applications. Patients who receive resin crowns should be aware that these are often an interim step rather than a definitive solution.

Comparing Materials: What to Consider

When selecting a material for a crown or bridge, several factors come into play:

Key Factors to Keep in Mind:

  • Location of the tooth: Front teeth often prioritize aesthetics, while molars require strength.
  • Bite pressure: Patients with strong bites or grinding habits may need tougher materials like metal or zirconia.
  • Aesthetics: Porcelain and ceramics provide the most natural appearance.
  • Allergies or sensitivities: Metal-free options are available for patients with known sensitivities.
  • Cost and insurance coverage: Some materials are more expensive and may not be fully covered by dental insurance.

Patients are encouraged to discuss their priorities and preferences with their dental provider. The material used can affect not only the appearance of the final restoration but also how it feels, how long it lasts, and how well it supports overall oral health.

The Role of Technology in Material Selection

Advancements in dental technology, such as computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM), have made it easier than ever to customize crowns and bridges with precision. Digital impressions and 3D milling systems allow dental labs to craft restorations from a variety of materials with greater accuracy and efficiency.

This technology also supports better communication between dental professionals and patients. Digital previews of proposed crowns and bridges allow for more informed discussions and increased satisfaction with the final result. Material choice is no longer just a clinical decision—it’s a collaborative one, empowered by technology and patient education.

Final Thoughts on Choosing the Right Material

There is no one-size-fits-all material for crowns and bridges. Each option—from porcelain and zirconia to metal and hybrid designs—has unique benefits and potential drawbacks. What works best for one patient might not be ideal for another, which is why understanding the differences is so important.

At Danforth Dental Solutions in Toronto, ON, we believe that educating patients about their restorative options leads to better outcomes and greater confidence in their care. With the right material, a well-made crown or bridge can restore function, improve aesthetics, and last for many years.

Resources

Kelly, J. R., & Benetti, P. (2011). Ceramic materials in dentistry: Historical evolution and current practice. Journal of Prosthodontic Research.

Kwon, S. J., & Lawson, N. C. (2018). Dental zirconia: A review of composition, properties, and effect on aesthetics. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.

Christensen, G. J. (2007). Porcelain-fused-to-metal vs. all-ceramic crowns. Journal of the American Dental Association.

  • cda
  • oral
  • adc
  • michigan